Press "Enter" to skip to content

Mumbai man compares online and offline food order bills, price difference sparks debate – Times Now

Mumbai man compares online and offline food order bills | Image: LinkedIn

KEY HIGHLIGHTS

  • Rahul Kabra shared pictures of bills for the same food he ordered from Zomato and offline
  • While the Zomato bill was for Rs 690, the offline order cost Rs 512
  • The price difference in online and offline orders has sparked a debate on the Internet
A Mumbai man compared the online and offline food order bills and discovered a disparity in the prices.
Rahul Kabra took to LinkedIn to share pictures of bills for the same food he ordered from Zomato and offline. The stark difference in the total amount of the bill has left netizens shocked.

“Proof that #Zomato wants to make more money per order than the food service provider!” Kabra wrote.

Related News

Service charge is off menu but it is not cool to be a miser when dining out

Service charge is off menu but it is not cool to be a miser when dining out

Tu bhi galti se order hua tha lekin mujhe refund nahi mila Desi dad roasts son after he puts wrong address while ordering food

Tu bhi galti se order hua tha, lekin mujhe refund nahi mila: Desi dad roasts son after he puts wrong address while ordering food

He placed an order for veg black pepper sauce, veg fried rice and mushroom momo from The Momo Factory in East Kandivali, Mumbai via Zomato.

“Cost for offline order INR 512. Cost for Zomato order INR 690 (after applied discount of INR 75). Cost escalation 34.76% per order at INR 178 = (690-512)/512,” he added.

Kabra said, “Assuming Zomato brings visibility and more orders to the food service provider, should it charge such high price? I think there is a need to cap this cost escalation which should be implemented by the government so as to make this a win-win for all stakeholders.”

Related News

Flight to Goa is cheaper Uber charges Mumbai man Rs 3000 for ride home amid heavy rain

‘Flight to Goa is cheaper’: Uber charges Mumbai man Rs 3,000 for ride home amid heavy rain

Passenger pays Rs 70 for a cup of tea on Shatabdi Express Indian Railways explains why

Passenger pays Rs 70 for a cup of tea on Shatabdi Express, Indian Railways explains why

The price difference in online and offline orders sparked a debate.

One user said, “Zomato does not decide the menu and the price. It’s the restaurant partners that provide the same. Some of these partners inflate the price to partly compensate for their commission to Zomato.”

Another wrote, “If you value your time, the expense of travelling to a restaurant for pick up (gas prices have risen significantly), and the hassles less than the extra cost you are incurring, it makes sense not to utilise these applications.”

A third user added, “It will be better if they keep the menu as same and take their charges separately. At least there will be no grievance with the users.”

Someone commented, “These food delivery apps have come to the conclusion that whatever they charge, we are ready to pay as we have time constraints… They are taking undue advantage of our situation.”

A post read, “And my observation, Zomato/Swiggy delivered packages have a lesser quantity than offline pickups from individuals.”

Yet another person said, “Swiggy showed price as 120 plus delivery charges. I was on my way to the restaurant, so I decided to just pick it up there. Surprisingly, the same thaali was offered for 99 rupees. Swiggy would have charged me roughly 140 Rs. for the same food, which was 40% extra. I believe the aggregation industry requires considerable strategic rethinking. I honestly don’t blame them because they need to generate cash and become profitable, but I’m afraid these approaches will backfire.”

Zomato responded to the post, saying, “Hi Rahul, Zomato being an intermediary platform between a customer and a restaurant, does not have any control over the prices implemented by the restaurant partners on our platform. That said, we have conveyed your feedback to the restaurant partner and have requested them to look into this.”